Outcome
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court affirmed dismissal of petitioner's G.L. c. 211, § 3 petition seeking review of an MCAD lack-of-probable-cause finding on his disability discrimination claim, holding the general superintendence statute does not authorize review of executive agency decisions.
What This Ruling Means
**Dempsey v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination**
**What Happened**
A worker named Dempsey filed a disability discrimination complaint with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD), the state agency that handles discrimination cases. When he was unhappy with how MCAD handled his case, he tried to challenge their decision by filing a petition in court asking the court to review what MCAD had done.
**What the Court Decided**
The court dismissed Dempsey's petition, ruling that it didn't have the authority to review MCAD's decisions through the legal route Dempsey chose. The court explained that if someone disagrees with how MCAD handles their discrimination case, they need to file a separate lawsuit in Superior Court under state anti-discrimination law, not ask the court to oversee MCAD's work.
**Why This Matters for Workers**
This case clarifies an important procedural rule for Massachusetts workers facing discrimination. If you file a discrimination complaint with MCAD and are unsatisfied with their process or decision, you cannot simply ask a court to review MCAD's handling of your case. Instead, you must file a separate discrimination lawsuit in Superior Court. Workers should understand this distinction to ensure they follow the correct legal path when pursuing discrimination claims.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.