Skip to main content

In Re Kylie H.

Tenn. Ct. App.July 15, 2022No. W2021-00612-COA-R3-PT

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
Appeal from trial court decision on petition to terminate parental rights

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision to terminate the mother's parental rights to two minor children, finding that grounds for termination existed and that termination was in the best interests of the children.

Excerpt

This is a termination of parental rights case. The Tennessee Department of Children's Services filed a petition to terminate the parental rights of a mother as to two of her minor children on various grounds. The trial court ultimately concluded that grounds existed for termination and that termination was in the best interests of the children. The mother now appeals. We affirm.

Similar Rulings

In Re Ava M.
Tenn. Ct. App.Jan 2026

A mother appeals the juvenile court's termination of her parental rights to two of her children. The trial court terminated the mother's parental rights on the findings that the petitioner, Tennessee Department of Children's Services, had proven the ground of severe abuse and that it was in the best interests of the children that the mother's parental rights be terminated. The mother appeals, contending that the finding that termination was in the best interests of the children was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We affirm.

Defendant Win
Jordan
M.D. Tenn.Jun 2025
Dismissed
In Re Travionna W.
Tenn. Ct. App.Oct 2022

This appeal concerns the termination of a mother's parental rights to four of her children. The trial court found that the Tennessee Department of Children's Services ("DCS") established several grounds for terminating the mother's parental rights and that termination of her rights was in the children's best interests. On appeal, the mother contends that the trial court erred when it terminated her rights because the evidence is insufficient to prove any ground for termination or that termination of her parental rights is in the children's best interests. We have determined that DCS proved grounds for termination and that termination of the mother's parental rights was in the best interests of the children. Accordingly, we affirm the termination of the mother's parental rights.

Defendant Win
In Re Brady R.
Tenn. Ct. App.Apr 2026
William H. Lublin v. Vastland Northcrest Development, LLC
Tenn. Ct. App.Mar 2026

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.