Skip to main contentDefendant WinUnknownDefendant WinDefendant WinDefendant Win
Adair v. United States
Fed. Cl.February 28, 2006No. No. 05-392 CCited 7 times
Defendant WinFederal Bureau of Prisons
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Hewitt
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Wage Theft
Outcome
The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that federal statutes requiring hazardous duty pay and environmental differentials do not mandate compensation for exposure to second-hand cigarette smoke.
Similar Rulings
Thomas O'Neal v. American Shaman Franchise Systems, Inc.
11th CircuitFeb 2026
American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
D.D.C.Apr 2022
FLRA
D.C. CircuitJul 2021
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
2nd CircuitSep 2014
Adkins
4th CircuitAug 2002
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.