Skip to main contentUnresolvableUnresolvableUnresolvableMixed ResultPlaintiff Win
Barkovic v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n
E.D. Mich.December 22, 2017No. Case Number 17–10281Cited 8 times
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Lawson
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Michigan
- Circuit
- 6th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Retaliation
Outcome
The federal district court granted defendants' motions to dismiss Barkovic's amended complaint, finding that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred federal jurisdiction over state bar disciplinary proceedings and that judicial defendants were immune from suit.
Similar Rulings
Alexander R Spitzer v. Attorney Grievance Commissio
MICHFeb 2015
Cornelius v. Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission
6th CircuitJan 2013
Nali
U.S. Supreme CourtOct 2005
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.