No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of judgment as a matter of law in favor of Kmart, holding that Pack failed to establish she was disabled under the ADA because her depression did not substantially limit major life activities, and even if it did, she failed to prove she was qualified for her pharmacy technician position.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.