No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the union defendants, holding that plaintiff was not covered by the collective bargaining agreement because she was an employee of a subordinate affiliate (Joint Board) rather than the signatory employer (UNITE) at the time of termination, and rejecting her untimely promissory-estoppel argument raised for the first time at summary judgment.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.