No specific laws identified for this ruling.
After remand from the Supreme Court, the Second Circuit vacated the district court's judgment in favor of plaintiffs and entered judgment as a matter of law for the defendant employer. The court held that under the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. City of Jackson, the appropriate test for ADEA disparate-impact claims is reasonableness rather than business necessity, and the employer's IRIF satisfied the reasonableness standard.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.