In re Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation

<p>Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Faribault county, upon a promissory note given in part payment for a harvester. The answer alleged want of consideration, and that the harvester was sold “on trial” and guarantied to work satisfactorily, and that it was returned because it failed to work satisfactorily.</p> <p>The action was tried by Severance, J., without a jury, and upon the findings of the court judgment was ordered for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from an order refusing a new trial.</p>