No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The appellate court vacated the defendant's sentence for witness tampering and remanded for resentencing because the district court improperly applied sentencing guidelines by using a base offense level that required conviction of a specific statute (18 U.S.C. § 1591(b)(1)) when the defendant had only been convicted of witness tampering.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.