No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The appellate court remanded the case for recalculation of damages, finding the trial judge's damages award of approximately $40.6 million was erroneous in its methodology and unsupported by findings, though affirming liability on the breach of duty claim.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.