Skip to main contentUnresolvableUnresolvableUnresolvableMixed ResultDefendant Win
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Other
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- 2nd Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Wrongful Termination
Outcome
This is a dissenting opinion in a military appellate case concerning whether a statement made after invocation of right to counsel was admissible; the dissent argues the statement was admissible and harmless error, but the overall case outcome cannot be determined from this dissent alone.
Browse more:Wrongful Termination cases
Similar Rulings
United States v. Sergeant First Class ADAM N. LOWE
ACCAFeb 2026
Santos de Oliveira v. Scores Holding Company Inc.
S.D.N.Y.Mar 2022
United States v. Private First Class ADAM T. LEATHORN
ACCADec 2020
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Giovanni Molina-Estrada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
9th CircuitJun 2002
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.