No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The dissenting judge argues that the use of a contingency fee multiplier was not supported by competent, substantial evidence and that the trial court's decision to award the multiplier should be reversed.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.