Skip to main content

Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. Yost

S.D. OhioJune 24, 2022No. 1:19-cv-00118
Mixed ResultYost

Case Details

Nature of Suit
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status
Unknown
Procedural Posture
Appeal/Motion regarding preliminary injunction in civil rights case involving state abortion law
State
Ohio
Circuit
6th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court addressed constitutional and statutory challenges to Ohio's abortion restrictions, resulting in a mixed outcome regarding preliminary injunctions and the scope of relief available to the plaintiff organization.

Similar Rulings

Chapman
S.D. OhioApr 2024
Unresolvable
Yost
Unknown CourtJul 1913

<p>Appeal, No. 191, April T., 1913, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1912, dismissing libel for divorce in case of Elmer P. Yost v. Ada A. Yost.</p> <p>Libel for divorce.</p> <p>Brown, J., filed the following opinion:</p> <p>1. The libel filed by libelant against respondent alleges that the said Ada A. Yost hath at divers times since the date of her marriage with your petitioner, had sexual intercourse with divers persons other than your petitioner and hath, at divers times since the time of her said marriage, committed the crime of adultery.</p> <p>2. The answer filed by respondent denies the charge, and avers that libelant has committed adultery both before and since his desertion of respondent.</p> <p>3. Libelant’s bill of particulars alleges the respondent, Ada A. Yost, committed adultery and had sexual intercourse with one, Carlton C. Anthony, commonly known by her as Dr. Anthony, at divers times, particularly beginning on or about April 20, 1912, and continuing once and twice a week for about three months immediately following thereafter, and at divers places, particularly at the respondent’s rooms at No. 501 Collins avenue, city of Pittsburg.</p> <p>And further committed adultery and had sexual intercourse with one. Raimer, or some person having a name of like sounding, and spoken of by the said respondent as “Ernest.” The said respondent, Ada A. Yost, committed adultery with the said Reymer at her rooms as above mentioned, several times a week before and after June 23, 1912, and on said last-mentioned day.</p> <p>And further committed adultery and had sexual intercourse with a person known as Paul Hughes at divers times at the rooms of the respondent as aforesaid, beginning contemporaneous with the time mentioned in connection Avith the said Carlton C. Anthony, that is to say, from April 20, 1912, until about August 1, 1912.</p> <p>And further committed adultery and had sexual intercourse with divers other persons, the time and plac

Dismissed
Calvin Walker v. Beaumont Indep School Dist
5th CircuitSep 2019
Dismissed
George M. Weeks, III v. Robert Bayer, Individually and in His Capacity as Director, Nevada Department of Prisons
9th CircuitApr 2001
Remanded
American Civil Liberties Union Fund v. Livingston County
6th CircuitAug 2015
Dismissed

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.