Outcome
The court reversed summary judgment on the breach of contract claim and, in dissent, would have reversed summary judgment on negligent/wanton hiring and supervision and premises liability claims. The majority affirmed summary judgment on the latter claims.
What This Ruling Means
**What happened:** Devine sued Northeast Treatment Centers (Tree of Life) after an incident that led to multiple claims. Devine argued the employer broke their contract, failed to properly hire and supervise employees, and didn't maintain safe premises. The lower court had dismissed all claims through summary judgment, meaning it ruled against Devine without a trial.
**What the court decided:** The appeals court gave Devine a partial victory. It overturned the dismissal of the breach of contract claim, meaning that issue can now go to trial. However, the court upheld the dismissal of claims about negligent hiring, supervision, and unsafe premises. One judge disagreed and would have allowed those claims to proceed as well.
**Why this matters for workers:** This case shows that employment contracts can provide meaningful protection for workers, even when other legal theories fail. When employers allegedly break contract terms, workers may have a viable path to court even if claims about workplace safety or poor supervision are dismissed. However, it also demonstrates how difficult it can be to prove negligent hiring and supervision claims, as courts often dismiss these before trial.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.