Skip to main content

Skip to main content

Workers’ Rights

Know. Document. Act.

Your Rights EEOC Guide Find an Attorney About

Sign In Check My Rights

Check My Rights

Workers' Rights is an educational tool that provides legal information, not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by using this platform. If you need legal advice, consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

Home/Employers/American Federation of Musicians Local No. 24

Nonprofit

American Federation of Musicians Local No. 24

1 employment law court ruling from public federal records (1906–1906)

About this employer

American Federation of Musicians Local No. 24 appears in one federal employment-law court ruling on record. The case sits within the nonprofit sector, where mission-alignment defenses sometimes complicate Title VII analysis. Employment-law cases tracked on Workers' Rights come from CourtListener's federal-court opinion corpus and reflect rulings that produced a written decision — many disputes settle or are dismissed before reaching this stage.

The cases primarily involve Breach of Contract, Wage Theft. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract and Wage Theft.

Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADEA (29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634) — The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects employees and job applicants who are 40 years of age or older from discrimination based on age in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, and other terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. See the ADEA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADEA.

The case was filed in Ohio. Ohio is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Ohio rulings.

1

Total Rulings

1

States

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

1 (100%)

1 (100%)

Related Laws

States

Court Rulings (1)

Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Z. T. Proctor

Unknown CourtJan 15, 1906Ohio

<p>CASE 13. — ACTION BY Z. T. PROCTOR AGAINST THE I. C. R. R. CO. AND OTHERS FOR DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURIES. — November 8, 1905.</p> <p>Appeal from Grayson Circuit Court.</p> <p>Weed S. Chele, Circuit Judge:</p> <p>Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.</p> <p>POINTS AND AUTHORITIES.</p> <p>1. Admission of incompetent testimony of statements of someone in overalls not shown to be an employe of appellant.</p> <p>2. Misconduct of counsel in his closing argument. (McHenry, &-c., Co. v. Sneddon, 98 Ky., 684; L., H. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Morgan, 23 Ky. Law Rep., 121; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Hull, 24 Ky. Law' Rep., 379; 113 Ky., 572; I. C. R. R. Co. v. Jolly, 27 Ky. Law Rep., 118.)</p> <p>3. The jury should have been instructed peremptorily to find for Ihe defendant. (Prance’s Admr. v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 15 Ky. Law</p> <p>Rep., 244; 22 S. W., 851; Ward’s Admr. v. I. C. R. R. Co., 22 Ky. Law Rep., 191; 56 S. W., 807; Yates v. I. C. R. R. Co. (not yet reported), September 21, 1905; Manning v. I. C. R. R. Co., 27 Ky. Law Rep., 142.)</p> <p>4. This action has been removed to the United States Circuit Court ior the Western District of Kentucky, and the Circuit Court erred in assuming jurisdiction of this action after the petition and bond for removal were filed. (C. & O. Ry. Co. v. Dixon, 179 U. S.; I. C. R. R. Co. v. Jones, 26 Ky. Law Reg., 31; 80 S. W., 484; Daughtry v. R. R. Co., 138 U. S., 299 (34 L. Ed., 963); B. C. R. & N., &c., Co. v. Dunn, 122 U. S., 513 (30 L. Ed., 1160); Durkee v. I. C. R. R. Co., 81 Fed., 1; Kelly v. Co., 122 Fed., 286; Gustafson, &e., v. Co., 128 Fed., 85; Crawford v. I. C. R. R. Co., 130 Fed., 395; Dishon’s Admr. v. C., N. O. &T. P., 133 Fed., 471; Wharton on “Agency and Agents,” section 536, p. 350; Blackstone, Vol. 1, p. 431; Wharton’s Agency, section 535; Shear. & Red. on Neg., 5th Ed., p. 52; Colvin v. Holbrook, 2 N. Y./129; Murray v. Usher, 117 N. Y., 549; Kelly v. Chicago, &c., Ry. Co., 122'Fed., 290; Davenport v. Southern Ry. Co., 124 Fed

Showing 1–1 of 1 rulings

Other Nonprofit employers

Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.

American Federation of Government Employees

Service Employees International Union

Service Employees International Union, Local 1000

American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO

American Postal Workers Union

American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Is this profile inaccurate? Request a correction →

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.