3 employment law court rulings from public federal records (2014–2023)
Cleveland Clinic appears in 3 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.
The case involves a breach of contract claim. Browse other breach of contract rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Breach of Contract.
Rulings span Ohio (1), New York (1). Ohio is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Ohio rulings and New York rulings.
Motion to compel discovery attorney-client privilege SERS report. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not err in ordering the Cleveland Clinic to provide its SERS report to the plaintiff, who slipped and fell at the Clinic while visiting a family member. There is no indication in the record that the person who completed the SERS report did so in anticipation of litigation or was a risk manager or an employee of the Clinic's Office of General Counsel. Therefore, the Clinic has not satisfied its burden of proof that the SERS report is privileged.
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.