Skip to main contentDefendant WinMixed ResultPlaintiff WinMixed ResultDefendant Win
Alvaro Orosco v. Ventura House of Smokes, Inc.
C.D. Cal.June 3, 2024No. 2:24-cv-04509
Mixed ResultWexford of Indiana LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
- State
- California
- Circuit
- 9th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Retaliation
Outcome
Order screening complaint and directing service of process. Court allowed Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim and First Amendment retaliation claim against Warden Zatecky to proceed, but dismissed claims against Jack Hendrix for failure to state a claim and dismissed Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment claims.
Browse more:Deliberate Indifference casesConditions Of Confinement casesRetaliation casesFailure To Train cases
Similar Rulings
Barrons
D. Ariz.Oct 2024
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Elana Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District, John J. Russell, Anne Brennan, Marilyn Wishnie
2nd CircuitApr 2004
Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
U.S. Supreme CourtJan 2012
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.