Skip to main contentDefendant WinUnresolvableDefendant WinMixed ResultDefendant Win
Maluf v. Bergelectric Corp
D. Nev.August 13, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00115
Defendant WinUnited States Drug Enforcement Administration
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Nevada
- Circuit
- 9th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Wrongful Termination
Outcome
The court denied the plaintiff pharmacy's motion to dissolve the DEA's Immediate Suspension Order, finding that the agency articulated a rational connection between facts gathered during its investigation and the decision to suspend the pharmacy's DEA registration based on imminent danger to public health and safety.
Similar Rulings
American Association of Physicians for Human Rights, Inc. v. National Institutes of Health
D. Md.Aug 2025
Adams
D.D.C.May 2014
DEA
D.C. CircuitFeb 2006
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Giovanni Molina-Estrada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
9th CircuitJun 2002
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.