Skip to main contentRemandedUnresolvableUnresolvablePlaintiff WinMixed Result
Dunlap-Banks v. City of Fayetteville
E.D.N.C.December 2, 2024No. 5:22-cv-00425
UnresolvableWal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Other
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
- State
- North Carolina
- Circuit
- 4th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Discrimination
Outcome
The court denied plaintiff's motion for sanctions against Walmart for failure to preserve evidence and denied defendant's countermotion for fees and costs, finding that plaintiff failed to meet the meet-and-confer requirement and that no case-dispositive sanction was warranted.
Browse more:Discrimination cases
Similar Rulings
H.
D. UtahFeb 2025
BREAKWATER TREATMENT AND WELLNESS CORP. v. THE CITY OF ASBURY PARK
D.N.J.Jan 2025
Maria Garcia v. Liberty Motor Sports, Inc.
C.D. Cal.Dec 2024
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Sheet Metal Workers
U.S. Supreme CourtJul 1986
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.