Skip to main contentUnresolvableDefendant WinDismissedMixed ResultRemanded
Estate of James Evans v. County of Los Angeles
C.D. Cal.September 15, 2025No. 2:24-cv-09198
Defendant WinState Farm Lloyds
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Other
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
- State
- California
- Circuit
- 9th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Breach of Contract
Outcome
The court granted the defendant's motion to exclude plaintiff's expert testimony regarding diminution in value of the insured property, finding the testimony irrelevant because the insurance policy does not cover diminution in value and defendant has not raised a pecuniary loss argument.
Similar Rulings
Jada Etienne v. State Farm Lloyds
Tex. App.—14th Dist.Sep 2019
Vada De Jongh v. State Farm Lloyds, Inc.
5th CircuitNov 2016
Adame
Tex. App.Oct 2016
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V Monada
11th CircuitDec 2005
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.