Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- Mandamus proceeding in appellate court
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Mandamus action concerning sick leave benefits, retirement, and termination rights under municipal ordinance; involves taxpayer standing and declaratory relief issues.
Excerpt
Mandamus, Sick Leave Benefits, Retirement, Termination, Ordinance, Taxpayer Standing, Clear Legal Right, Declaratory Relief
Similar Rulings
Murder; attempted murder; self-defense; castle doctrine; rebuttable presumption of self-defense; reasonable force; jury instructions; lesser-included offenses; expert testimony; post-traumatic stress disorder. Defendant's convictions for murder, attempted murder and felonious assault, all with firearm specifications, are affirmed. Defendant admitted to shooting and killing his roommate but argued that he did so in self-defense. The victim was coming home and attempting to enter the house through the front door, with her seven-month-old child in her arms, when the defendant fired 14 shots from an assault rifle through the closed door while he was inside the house. The defendant argued he acted in self-defense because he has post-traumatic stress disorder and he thought someone was trying to unlawfully enter the house. He failed to look at the doorbell camera video of the front door before firing his gun. The court did not err in instructing the jury regarding self-defense and the castle doctrine. The court did not err in not instructing the jury regarding lesser-included offenses, because the defendant acted knowingly and/or purposefully when he fired the assault rifle. The court did not err in allowing defendant's expert witness to testify about post-traumatic stress disorder but limiting what the expert said about the defendant's state of mind.
Mandamus to compel State Employment Relations Board either to find that relator's unfair labor practice charge was timely filed and proceed with a hearing or consider the facts concerning the timeliness question and issue an explanation setting forth its rationale—Writ denied, when.
Appellate procedure—Court of appeals' decision in mandamus action ordering cause returned to magistrate for a determination on the merits appealed to Supreme Court—Appeal dismissed by Supreme Court for want of prosecution—Dismissal of mandamus action by court of appeals for lack of jurisdiction reversed and cause remanded to court of appeals for a consideration of the merits of relator's mandamus action.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.