Skip to main content

Cole Robert Hooker v. David Sean Kennedy

Minn. Ct. App.January 20, 2026No. a251188
Defendant WinDavid Sean Kennedy

Case Details

Status
Unpublished
Procedural Posture
Appeal affirmed

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Harassment

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the district court's determination that it had personal jurisdiction over the defendant in a harassment restraining order dispute, rejecting the pro se appellant's jurisdictional challenge.

Excerpt

In this dispute related to a harassment restraining order (HRO), pro se appellant argues that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over him. Because the district court did not err in determining that it had personal jurisdiction over appellant, we affirm.

Browse more:Harassment cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.