Tamer K. Embaby, Relator v. Department of Treasury, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...

In this certiorari appeal from the decision of an unemployment-law judge (ULJ), relator challenges the ULJ's conclusion that she is ineligible for unemployment benefits because she was discharged for employment misconduct. She argues that (1) the ULJ's determination that she was discharged for employment misconduct was not supported by substantial evidence, and (2) the ULJ erred by failing to consider any exceptions to ineligibility based on employment misconduct. Because we conclude that the ULJ's determination that relator was discharged for employment misconduct was supported by substantial evidence, and none of the statutory exceptions to ineligibility based employment misconduct apply, we affirm.

Relator challenges an unemployment-law judge's determination that she was ineligible for unemployment benefits because she was neither available for nor actively seeking suitable employment. We affirm.