Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. General Motors Corp.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Saffels
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- summary judgment
- State
- Kansas
- Circuit
- 10th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted defendant General Motors' motion for partial summary judgment on counts III, IV, and V of the plaintiff's complaint, dismissing claims for negligence (breach of duty to provide safe workplace) and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The court found the negligence claims time-barred under Kansas' two-year statute of limitations and determined that GM's conduct could not be characterized as extreme and outrageous as a matter of law under Kansas law.
Similar Rulings
In this appeal, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants conspired to prevent new cars sold in Canada from being imported into Tennessee and the rest of the United States in violation of Tennessee's antitrust and consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs contended that new car prices in Canada are significantly lower than prices for the same cars in the United States and that the effect of the conspiracy was to restrict competition and maintain significantly higher prices. The trial court approved a settlement agreement and dismissed the case with prejudice against certain defendants. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.