General Motors, LLC
112 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (1989–2026)
15 trusted published court opinions across 14 distinct cases · 13 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, General Motors, LLC is named as a defendant in 112 federal cases coded as employment matters between 1989 and 2026.
Of the 15 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 8 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 were sent back to a lower court, 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 settled.
Plaintiffs won 2 of 11 adjudicated opinions (18%).
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Discrimination, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 8 states, most often in DC.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 14 distinct cases.
2 of 11 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
General Motors, LLC appears in 15 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Adam Foust v. General Motors, LLC (2026) — Remanded. Read the ruling.
Jobe v. General Motors, LLC (2023) — Defendant Win. A worker filed a lawsuit against General Motors claiming discrimination based on race and sex, along with claims of retaliation and a hostile work environment. Read the ruling.
Myles v. General Motors, LLC (2022) — Defendant Win. Myles worked at General Motors and was fired. He sued the company, claiming he was terminated because of his race and in retaliation for speaking up about discrimination. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (8 of 15), Discrimination (8 of 15), Breach of Contract (3 of 15). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Discrimination and Breach of Contract.
Published opinions span District of Columbia (1), Illinois (1), Kentucky (1), Michigan (1). District of Columbia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. District of Columbia rulings, Illinois rulings, Kentucky rulings and Michigan rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
15 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 6 summary-judgment opinions, 4 ended the case in General Motors, LLC’s favor and 2 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
14 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
- Employee v. General Motors LLC3rd Circuit · 2024 · Delaware
- Employee v. General Motors LLCD. Del. · 2021 · Delaware
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. EmployeeN.D. Ohio · 2021 · Ohio
- Employee v. General Motors Hourly-Rate Employee's Pension PlanN.D.N.Y. · 2015 · New York
- Employee v. Local 1112 International Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement WorkersN.D. Ohio · 2014 · Ohio
- Employee v. General Motors6th Circuit · 2013 · Michigan
- Employee v. General Motors LLC6th Circuit · 2013 · Michigan
- Employee v. General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan7th Circuit · 2006
- Employee v. General Motors Retirement Program for Salaried EmployeesS.D. Ohio · 2006 · Ohio
- Employee v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers6th Circuit · 2005
- Employee v. International Union6th Circuit · 2005
- Employee v. United Automobile Workers, International Union Local 5986th Circuit · 2002
- Employee v. Lift-A-Loft Corp.6th Circuit · 2001
- Employee v. Employment Security Board of ReviewKANCTAPP · 2000
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.