Skip to main content
Finance

Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO)

235 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2004–2026)

17 trusted published court opinions across 16 distinct cases · 12 docket-only cases without a recorded end date

What public court records show

In public federal court records, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) is named as a defendant in 235 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2004 and 2026.

Of the 17 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 10 ended in a ruling for the employer, 4 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 were sent back to a lower court, and 1 had a mixed result.

Plaintiffs won 4 of 15 adjudicated opinions (27%).

The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Retaliation, and Wrongful Termination.

Cases were filed across 6 states, most often in NY.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

17
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 16 distinct cases.

27%
Plaintiff Win Rate

4 of 15 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

6
States

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) appears in 17 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:

Zappala v. Government Employees Ins. Co. CA4/1 (2026) — Defendant Win. Read the ruling.

Plump v. Government Employees Insurance Company (2025) — Defendant Win. Plump filed a lawsuit against GEICO claiming racial discrimination, retaliation, and failure to provide workplace accommodations. He asserted violations under federal employment laws protecting workers from discrimination and retaliation, and requiring reasonable accommodations for disabilities and family medical leave… Read the ruling.

Hart v. Government Employees Insurance Company (2022) — Plaintiff Win. Read the ruling.

The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (9 of 17), Retaliation (7 of 17), Wrongful Termination (5 of 17). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Retaliation and Wrongful Termination.

Published opinions span New York (5), Kansas (1), Maryland (1), Florida (1). New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings, Kansas rulings, Maryland rulings and Florida rulings.

These published opinions sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims.

Opinion Outcomes

Defendant Win
10 (59%)
Plaintiff Win
4 (24%)
Remanded
2 (12%)
Mixed Result
1 (6%)

Opinion Stages

17 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.

Appeal
12 (71%)
Summary judgment
4 (24%)

Of the 4 summary-judgment opinions, 2 ended the case in Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO)’s favor and 2 let the worker’s claims continue.

Motion to dismiss
1 (6%)
What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Summary judgment
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Motion to dismiss
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Geico Indemnity Company
M.D. Fla. · May 2026
Employee v. Government Employees Ins. Co. CA4/1
Cal. Ct. App. · Jan 2026 · Disability
Defendant Win
Employee v. Government Employees Insurance Company
10th Circuit · Dec 2025 · Kansas · Discrimination
Defendant Win
Employee v. Geico Indemnity Company
M.D. Fla. · Nov 2025
Employee v. Geico General Insurance Company
M.D. Fla. · Sep 2025
Employee v. Geico General Insurance Company
M.D. Fla. · Aug 2025
Employee v. Geico Casualty Company
M.D. Fla. · Jun 2025
Employee v. Government Employees Insurance Company Inc.
M.D. Fla. · Jun 2025
Employee v. Government Employees Insurance Company
E.D.N.Y. · Jun 2025
Employee v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
M.D. Ga. · Mar 2025
Docket closed
Employee v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
M.D. Ga. · Feb 2025
Employee v. Geico General Insurance Co.
M.D. Fla. · Nov 2024
Employee v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC
M.D. Ga. · Jun 2024
Docket closed
Employee v. Government Employees Insurance Company
S.D. Cal. · Dec 2023
Docket closed
Employee v. Geico Casualty Insurance Company
D. Md. · Oct 2023
Docket closed
Employee v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY <strong><font size="4"><font color="red">DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - DOCKET IN CASE NO 5:23-cv-430-MTT.</strong></font>
M.D. Ga. · Oct 2023
Employee v. Government Employees Insurance Company
E.D.N.Y. · Apr 2023
Employee v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
M.D. Ga. · Dec 2022
Docket closed
Employee v. Government Employees Insurance Company
E.D.N.Y. · Oct 2022
Employee v. GEICO Insurance Agency, LLC
W.D.N.C. · Oct 2022
Docket closed
Employee v. Geico
E.D.N.Y. · Jun 2022
Docket closed
Employee v. Government Employees Insurance Company
M.D. Pa. · Feb 2022 · Pennsylvania · Wage Theft
Plaintiff Win
Employee v. Government Employees Insurance Company
D. Md. · Jan 2022
Docket closed
Employee v. Government Employees Insurance Company
N.D. Ohio · Dec 2021
Docket closed
Employee v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY
S.D. Ind. · Nov 2021
Docket closed
Showing 25 of 235

Other court records naming this party

60 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.

Showing the 50 most recent of 60.

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.