First Union National Bank
8 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2001–2005)
8 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, First Union National Bank is named as a party in 8 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2001 and 2005.
Of the 7 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, 1 had a mixed result, and 1 was sent back to a lower court.
1 further opinion is listed below but left out of these outcome figures, because the employer brought the case or was not a party to it.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Breach Of Contract, and Wage Theft.
Cases were filed across 1 state (CT).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
First Union National Bank appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Arndt v. First Union National Bank (2005) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved an employee, Arndt, who sued First Union National Bank for not paying wages properly and breaking their employment contract. Arndt claimed the bank failed to pay him what he was owed under both his employment agreement and North Carolina's wage and hour laws. Read the ruling.
Stone v. First Union Corporation (2004) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved workers who wanted to join an existing age discrimination lawsuit against First Union Corporation. The original lawsuit was filed by one employee claiming the company discriminated against older workers. Read the ruling.
Rogers v. First Union National Bank (2003) — Mixed Result. This case involved an employee named Rogers who sued First Union National Bank for age discrimination. Rogers claimed the bank treated older workers unfairly in two ways: through direct discrimination against individual older employees, and through company policies that had a broader negative impact on older workers as… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (4 of 8), Breach of Contract (4 of 8), Wage Theft (3 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Breach of Contract and Wage Theft.
Published opinions span Connecticut. Connecticut is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Connecticut rulings.
These published opinions sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims.
Opinion Outcomes
1 listed opinion is not counted here: the employer brought the case, or was not a party to an appeal against an agency, so the recorded outcome is not a result for or against a worker.
Opinion Stages
7 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 0 ended the case in First Union National Bank’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
28 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
- Employee v. First Union Nat'l Bank11th Circuit · 2007
- Employee v. CurtisMe. · 2005
- Employee v. First Union National Bank6th Circuit · 2005
- Employee v. First Union Securities, Inc.WISCTAPP · 2005
- Employee v. First Union National Bank11th Circuit · 2004
- Employee v. First Union National BankPa. Super. Ct. · 2003
- Employee v. First Union National1st Circuit · 2003
- Employee v. First Union National11th Circuit · 2003
- Employee v. First Union National1st Circuit · 2003
- W & D Acquisition, LLC v. EmployeeConn. · 2003
- Employee v. First Union National Bank4th Circuit · 2003
- Employee v. First Union Nat'l BankD. Md. · 2003 · Maryland
- University Nursing Care Center, Inc. v. EmployeeFla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002
- Employee v. First Union Nat. BankFla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002
- Employee v. First Union National Bank, No. Cv00 037 25 15 (Jun. 7, 2002)Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002
- OFFISS, Inc. v. EmployeeN.C. Ct. App. · 2002
- National Title Insurance Corp. Agency v. EmployeeVa. · 2002
- Employee v. Bogardus, No. Cv00 0071447s (Dec. 10, 2001)Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001
- Employee v. Hollis, No. Cv01-0557542s (Aug. 28, 2001)Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001
- Employee v. First Union Corp.N.C. Bus. Ct. · 2001
- Employee v. First Union N.B., No. Cv 98 0353499 S (Jul. 31, 2001)Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001
- Employee v. First Union National BankVACCRICHMONDCTY · 2001
- Employee v. First Union National BankArk. · 2000
- Employee v. First Union National BankFla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2000
- Employee v. First Union Mortgage Corp11th Circuit · 2000
- Employee v. First Union Mortgage Corp11th Circuit · 2000
- Employee v. 1st Union Nat'l Bank10th Circuit · 2000
- Employee v. Mase, No. Cv 98 0084626 (Apr. 17, 2000)Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.