Transunion
86 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2000–2025)
86 trusted published court opinions across 81 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Transunion as an employer in 86 distinct federal employment cases between 2000 and 2025.
Of the 86 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 52 ended in a ruling for the employer, 11 were dismissed, 11 had a mixed result, and 5 ended in a ruling for the worker.
Plaintiffs won 5 of 79 adjudicated opinions (6%).
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Failure To Accommodate, and Wage Theft.
Cases were filed across 18 states, most often in PA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 81 distinct cases.
5 of 79 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Positive amounts in plaintiff-win, mixed-outcome, or settlement opinions only. AI-extracted; amounts may not equal money paid.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Transunion appears in 86 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Rogers v. TransUnion (2024) — Defendant Win. This case involved a civil rights dispute between a worker named Rogers and TransUnion, the major credit reporting company. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in New York's Eastern District in April 2024, but the specific details of what Rogers claimed TransUnion did wrong are not available from the court records. Read the ruling.
Clincy v. TransUnion LLC (2017) — Defendant Win. An employee named Clincy filed a lawsuit against TransUnion LLC, claiming the company fired him because of his race. Clincy believed discrimination played a role in his termination. Read the ruling.
Patrick Doyle v. Trans Union (2016) — Defendant Win. Patrick Doyle sued Trans Union, a major credit reporting company, claiming wrongful termination and other violations related to debt collection practices. Doyle alleged problems with how Trans Union reported information about his debts and handled collection activities. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract (20 of 86), Failure to Accommodate (10 of 86), Wage Theft (3 of 86). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Failure to Accommodate and Wage Theft.
Published opinions span Pennsylvania (8), California (5), New York (3), Wisconsin (2). Pennsylvania is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Pennsylvania rulings, California rulings, New York rulings and Wisconsin rulings.
These published opinions sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
86 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 19 summary-judgment opinions, 12 ended the case in Transunion’s favor and 7 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Finance employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.