Skip to main content

Cornock v. Trans Union LLC

D.N.H.July 29, 2009No. Civil 07-cv-391-JLCited 5 times
Defendant WinTrans Union LLC
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Joseph N. Laplante
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

Trans Union's motion for summary judgment was granted. The court held that Cornock could not show the MBNA account listing was an "inaccuracy" under FCRA § 611(a) because the validity of the underlying debt involves legal questions that credit agencies are not obligated to resolve.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Cornock sued his employer Trans Union LLC over a credit report dispute. He claimed the company failed to accommodate him properly, though the specific details of the accommodation request aren't clear from the available information. The case involved questions about how credit reporting agencies handle disputed account information on credit reports. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of Trans Union and dismissed Cornock's case entirely. The judge granted Trans Union's motion for summary judgment, which means the court decided Trans Union should win without needing a full trial. The court found that Cornock couldn't prove that certain account information on a credit report was actually "inaccurate" under federal credit reporting laws. The judge explained that when disputes involve complex legal questions about whether someone owes a debt, credit agencies aren't required to resolve those disputes. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows how difficult it can be for employees to win cases against large companies, especially when the legal issues are complicated. Workers should understand that accommodation claims and credit reporting disputes often involve complex legal standards that can be challenging to meet in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Gore
5th CircuitFeb 2026
Defendant Win
Johnson v. North Texas Dancers, LLC
N.D. Tex.May 2021
Settlement
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
People in re S.L. and A.L
COLOCTAPPDec 2017

The Rio Blanco County Department of Human Services (Department) became involved with the parents in this case as a result of concerns about the children's welfare due to the condition of the family home, the parents' use of methamphetamine, and criminal cases involving the parents. Attempts at voluntary services failed, and on the Department's petition for dependency and neglect, the district court ultimately terminated the parents' rights. On appeal, the parents contended that the Department failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify them with their children. Specifically, the parents contended that the Department did not give them sufficient time to complete the services under their treatment plans and failed to accommodate their drug testing needs. The termination hearing was not held until more than a year after the motion to terminate was filed. For nine months before the motion to terminate was filed, the Department provided numerous services to the parents, including substance abuse therapy, therapeutic visitation supervision, drug abuse monitoring, and a parental capacity evaluation. The Department also provided counseling for the children. Both parents missed drug tests and tested positive during the testing period, and both were arrested for possession of methamphetamine during the pendency of the case. The Department made reasonable accommodations to meet the parents' needs and the parents had sufficient time to comply with their treatment plans. The record supports the trial court's findings that termination was appropriate because (1) the court-approved appropriate treatment plan had not been complied with by the parents or had not been successful in rehabilitating them (2) the parents were unfit and (3) the conduct or condition of the parents was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. Father also contended that the trial court's decision to interview the 9-year-old twin children together in chambers fundamentally and seriously affected the basi

Defendant Win
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Plaintiff Win

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.