Skip to main content

Crabill v. Trans Union L.L.C.

C.D. Ill.April 17, 2000No. 99-1024Cited 1 time
Defendant WinTrans Union L.L.C.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Mihm
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted Trans Union's motion for summary judgment and denied the plaintiff's motion, finding that Trans Union followed reasonable procedures under the Fair Credit Reporting Act despite reporting technically correct but potentially misleading information, and that the plaintiff failed to establish a violation of the Act.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** Crabill sued his former employer Trans Union L.L.C. for breach of contract. The case involved issues related to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which governs how companies handle and report personal information about individuals. Crabill claimed that Trans Union violated this law by reporting information about him that was technically accurate but potentially misleading to others who might see his credit report. **What the court decided:** The court ruled in favor of Trans Union. The judge found that even though the information Trans Union reported might have been misleading, the company had followed reasonable procedures required under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The court granted Trans Union's request to dismiss the case and denied Crabill's legal motions. Crabill was not awarded any money damages. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling shows that companies can avoid legal trouble under credit reporting laws as long as they follow proper procedures, even if the information they report could be interpreted in ways that might harm someone's reputation. Workers should be aware that employers in the credit reporting industry have significant legal protection when they follow established procedures, making it challenging to successfully sue them for how they handle personal information.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.