Skip to main content

Moore v. United Automobile Workers, International Union Local 598

6th CircuitMarch 28, 2002No. No. 00-2341Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Batchelder, Siler, Suhrheinrich
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court affirmed summary judgment in favor of General Motors and Local 598, finding Moore's hybrid §301 breach of contract and fair representation claims time-barred under the six-month statute of limitations.

What This Ruling Means

**Moore v. United Automobile Workers Case Summary** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Moore and both General Motors Corporation and the United Automobile Workers Local 598 union. Moore filed a lawsuit claiming that both his employer and his union had violated their legal duties to him under his employment contract and union representation agreement. The court ruled against Moore and in favor of both General Motors and the union. The judge determined that Moore had waited too long to file his lawsuit. Employment law requires workers to bring these types of claims within six months of when the problem occurred, and Moore had missed this deadline. Because he filed his case after the time limit expired, the court dismissed his claims without examining whether Moore's complaints had merit. This ruling is important for workers because it highlights a critical time limit that can make or break a case. When workers believe their employer or union has violated their rights, they must act quickly. Even if a worker has a valid complaint, waiting too long to file a lawsuit can result in losing the right to seek justice entirely. Workers should consult with attorneys promptly when workplace issues arise to avoid missing important deadlines.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.