United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. General Motors Corp.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Andersen
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- summary judgment
- State
- Illinois
- Circuit
- 7th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The EEOC prevailed on its retaliation claim. The court granted EEOC's motion for partial summary judgment, finding that GM's policy of suspending its internal 'open door' dispute resolution procedures while an employee has a charge pending with the EEOC violates Title VII and the ADEA as unlawful retaliation for filing administrative charges.
Similar Rulings
In this appeal, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants conspired to prevent new cars sold in Canada from being imported into Tennessee and the rest of the United States in violation of Tennessee's antitrust and consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs contended that new car prices in Canada are significantly lower than prices for the same cars in the United States and that the effect of the conspiracy was to restrict competition and maintain significantly higher prices. The trial court approved a settlement agreement and dismissed the case with prejudice against certain defendants. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.