Skip to main contentPlaintiff WinMixed ResultDefendant WinPlaintiff WinMixed Result
Gehring v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
PAApril 17, 2007No. 105 MAP 2005Cited 3 times
Plaintiff WinBorough of Hamburg
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Former
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
RetaliationUnfair Labor Practice
Outcome
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed prior precedent and held that probationary police officers are entitled to collective bargaining rights under Act 111 and can file unfair labor practice charges under the PLRA, remanding the case for the Board to determine whether to issue a complaint on Gehring's retaliation claim.
Similar Rulings
Gehring
Pa. Commw. Ct.May 2004
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1974
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Elana Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District, John J. Russell, Anne Brennan, Marilyn Wishnie
2nd CircuitApr 2004
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.