Skip to main contentDismissedDefendant WinDefendant WinMixed ResultPlaintiff Win
Perez-Morciglio v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
D. Nev.October 25, 2011No. 2:10-cv-899Cited 14 times
Defendant WinLas Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Philip M. Pro
- Nature of Suit
- 440 Civil rights other
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- summary judgment
- State
- Nevada
- Circuit
- 9th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
RetaliationHostile Work Environment
Outcome
The court granted summary judgment in favor of LVMPD defendants on all claims, finding no violation of plaintiffs' First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, or Fourteenth Amendment rights, and that officers were entitled to qualified immunity.
Similar Rulings
Randolph v. Trustees of the Cal. State University
Cal. Ct. App.Jan 2026
Gilbertson
D. Neb.Dec 2025
Rojas
S.D.N.Y.Oct 2025
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.