Skip to main contentPlaintiff WinDefendant WinMixed ResultPlaintiff WinMixed Result
Williams v. City of Tulsa, Ok
N.D. Okla.September 30, 2005No. 4:04-cv-00326Cited 7 times
Defendant WinCity of Tulsa
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- H. Dale Cook
- Nature of Suit
- 440 Civil rights other
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- summary judgment
- State
- Oklahoma
- Circuit
- 10th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
RetaliationHarassment
Outcome
The court granted summary judgment for the City of Tulsa and the individual supervisors on all claims, finding that plaintiffs failed to establish essential elements of their Fourth Amendment, First Amendment retaliation, § 1983 municipal liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims.
Similar Rulings
Jiang v. City of Tulsa
10th CircuitMar 2026
Williams v. City of Aurora, Colorado
D. Colo.Mar 2021
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Elana Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District, John J. Russell, Anne Brennan, Marilyn Wishnie
2nd CircuitApr 2004
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.