No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of a correctional officer's Whistleblower Act retaliation claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because, as a career State employee, he was required to file his contested case in the Office of Administrative Hearings within 30 days under the North Carolina Human Resources Act.
Subject matter jurisdiction N.C. Gen. Stat. 126-34.02 Whistleblower grievance
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Office of Administrative hearings had subject matter jurisdiction over contested case where administrative law judge chose to credit testimony regarding whether grievance was timely filed
Office of Administrative hearings had subject matter jurisdiction over contested case where administrative law judge chose to credit testimony regarding whether grievance was timely filed
Discrimination on the basis of sex burden-shifting framework veteran's preference
Discharge from employment Office of Administrative Hearings notice of appeal proof of filing exhaust administrative remedies DPS form HR 556 inconsistent instructions.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.