Skip to main content

37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1346, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,269, 6 Employee Benefits Ca 1629

8th CircuitMay 15, 1985No. 1257

Case Details

Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal
Circuit
8th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court affirmed the district court's judgment in favor of Union Electric Company, holding that the company's group life insurance plan with a 40-year-old age cutoff for new enrollments did not violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act because all employees had an opportunity to enroll when hired and the plan adhered to sound actuarial principles.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.