Skip to main content

Richard Lee Brown v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

11th CircuitJuly 14, 2021No. 20-14210Cited 11 times
Remanded

Case Details

Citation
4 F.4th 1220
Nature of Suit
NEW
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal
State
Texas
Circuit
11th Circuit

Outcome

The conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated was reversed due to introduction of irrelevant and prejudicial testimony regarding an unrelated pig theft. The case was remanded for a new trial.

Similar Rulings

Texas Department of Public Safety and Christina Mitchell, in Her Official Capacity as 38th Judicial District Attorney v. Texas Tribune; ABC News; CBS News; Cable News Network, Inc.; Dow Jones & Co.; Gannett Co., Inc.; Graham Media Group, Houston; Graham Media Group, San Antonio; NBC News; The New York Times Co.; Pro Publica, Inc.; Scripps Media, Inc.; Tegna Inc.; And the Washington Post
TXCTAPP15Mar 2026
Dismissed
In the Matter of the Adoption of Minor Children, Dustin Hill v. Kimberly and Daniel Cortez and Arkansas Department of Human Services
Ark. Ct. App.Feb 2026
Dismissed
Melanie T. Tellison v. Texas Workforce Commission and Two Dimensions Preparatory Academy, Inc.
TXCTAPP15Dec 2025
Dismissed
Tseng
Unknown CourtMay 2025

Directed verdict; wage discrimination; Ohio's Equal Pay Act; R.C. 4111.17; age discrimination; disparate treatment; disparate impact; prima facie case; indirect evidence; R.C. 4112.02; de novo. Judgment affirmed. The trial court's grant of appellee's motion for directed verdict on appellant's wage- and age-discrimination claims was proper. Appellant failed to demonstrate that the employee wage compensation plan adopted by appellee is discriminatory and violates R.C. 4111.17 and 4112.02. When construing the facts most strongly in appellant's favor, we find that appellant did not meet his burden to establish the elements of his wage-discrimination claim or his age-discrimination claim. Appellant admitted that all of the vascular interventional radiologists with the same academic rank were paid the same base salary, failed to present evidence of adverse employment actions by appellee, and failed to present a statistically relevant analysis to prove that appellee's wage compensation plan caused an adverse impact on employees over 40.

Defendant Win
Peter Gibbs and Brett (Brooke) Sonia v. P N.H. Department of Corrections Commissioner Helen Hanks et al.
D.N.H.Aug 2021
Dismissed

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.