State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement Board
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the court of appeals' decision granting a limited writ of mandamus, requiring PERB to vacate its denial of PERS service credit claims and issue a new order adjudicating the merits. The court found PERB abused its discretion in applying collateral estoppel to bar appellees' claims.
Similar Rulings
Mandamus—Writ sought by public employee ordering retirement board to transfer her from one type of retirement plan to different type of plan—No provision in R.C. Chapter 145 establishes clear legal right for public employee to obtain relief sought or imposes clear legal duty on retirement board to grant it—Court of appeals' denial of writ affirmed.
Objection of respondent sustained and writ of mandamus denied. Relator has not shown that she has a clear legal right to the relief she requests, nor that respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the act requested. Therefore, relator is not entitled to a writ of mandamus ordering respondent, Public Employees Retirement Board, to retroactively modify relator's retirement plan with the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System from the Combined Plan to the Traditional Pension Plan, effective to October 8, 1987, her original date of hire by the Franklin County Public Defender.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.