Public Employees Retirement Board
30 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2002–2021)
30 trusted published court opinions across 30 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Public Employees Retirement Board as an employer in 30 distinct federal employment cases between 2002 and 2021.
Of the 30 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 15 ended in a ruling for the employer, 10 ended in a ruling for the worker, 4 were sent back to a lower court, and 1 had a mixed result.
Plaintiffs won 10 of 26 adjudicated opinions (38%).
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Wrongful Termination, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 1 state (OR).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 30 distinct cases.
10 of 26 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Public Employees Retirement Board appears in 30 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Vigil v. Public Employees Retirement Board (2015) — Plaintiff Win. Ms. Vigil, an employee of the Public Employees Retirement Board, was injured on the job and applied for disability retirement benefits. A hearing officer reviewed her case and recommended approving her claim. Read the ruling.
Vinson v. Public Employees Retirement Board (2012) — Defendant Win. Unfortunately, the available information about this 2012 employment case between Vinson and the Public Employees Retirement Board is extremely limited. The case records do not provide sufficient details about what workplace dispute occurred, what specific employment law claims were made, or how the court ultimately rul… Read the ruling.
Whitaker v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BD. (2012) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute between an employee named Whitaker and the Public Employees Retirement Board, which manages retirement benefits for government workers. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract (9 of 30), Wrongful Termination (6 of 30), Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Wrongful Termination and Discrimination.
Published opinions span Oregon. Oregon is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Oregon rulings.
These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
30 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Government & Public Sector employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.