Skip to main content
Government & Public Sector

New York City Transit Authority

152 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (1997–2026)

25 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 22 map to 20 distinct cases · 28 docket-only cases without a recorded end date

What public court records show

In public federal court records, New York City Transit Authority is named as a party in 152 federal cases coded as employment matters between 1997 and 2026.

Of the 23 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 9 ended in a ruling for the employer, 7 ended in a ruling for the worker, 4 were dismissed, and 2 were sent back to a lower court.

2 further opinions are listed below but left out of these outcome figures, because the employer brought the case or was not a party to it.

Plaintiffs won 7 of 21 adjudicated opinions (33%).

The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Retaliation, and Hostile Work Environment.

Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

25
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 20 distinct cases.

33%
Plaintiff Win Rate

7 of 21 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

1
State

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

New York City Transit Authority appears in 25 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:

Imhof v. New York CIty Housing Authority (2025) — Defendant Win. An employee filed a lawsuit against the New York City Housing Authority, claiming discrimination, retaliation, harassment, and failure to accommodate a disability. Read the ruling.

Burlingame v. Adams (2025) — Defendant Win. Read the ruling.

Richards v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation (2023) — Defendant Win. Read the ruling.

The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (13 of 25), Retaliation (7 of 25), Hostile Work Environment (6 of 25). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Retaliation and Hostile Work Environment.

Published opinions span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.

These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.

Opinion Outcomes

Defendant Win
9 (39%)
Plaintiff Win
7 (30%)
Dismissed
4 (17%)
Remanded
2 (9%)
Mixed Result
1 (4%)

2 listed opinions are not counted here: the employer brought the case, or was not a party to an appeal against an agency, so the recorded outcome is not a result for or against a worker.

Opinion Stages

19 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.

Appeal
6 (32%)
Summary judgment
4 (21%)

Of the 4 summary-judgment opinions, 3 ended the case in New York City Transit Authority’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.

Motion to dismiss
5 (26%)
Trial verdict
3 (16%)
Other rulings
1 (5%)
What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Summary judgment
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Motion to dismiss
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Trial verdict
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Other rulings
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

States

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. New York City Health And Hospitals Corporation
S.D.N.Y. · Apr 2026
Employee v. New York City Transit Authority
E.D.N.Y. · Apr 2026
Employee v. New York City Health & Hospitals
E.D.N.Y. · Mar 2026
Employee v. New York City Housing Authority
E.D.N.Y. · Mar 2026
Employee v. New York City Health + Hospitals Corporation
S.D.N.Y. · Mar 2026
Employee v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
E.D.N.Y. · Mar 2026
Employee v. New York City Transit Authority
E.D.N.Y. · Feb 2026
Employee v. New York City Health And Hospitals Corporation
S.D.N.Y. · Feb 2026
Employee v. New York City Transit Authority
S.D.N.Y. · Dec 2025
Employee v. New York City Transit Authority
S.D.N.Y. · Sep 2025
Employee v. New York City Transit Authority
S.D.N.Y. · Sep 2025
Employee v. New York City Housing Authority
S.D.N.Y. · Sep 2025
Employee v. New York City Health And Hospitals Corporation
S.D.N.Y. · Aug 2025
Employee v. New York City Transit Authority
S.D.N.Y. · Aug 2025
Employee v. New York City Housing Authority
E.D.N.Y. · Aug 2025
Employee v. New York CIty Housing Authority
S.D.N.Y. · Jul 2025 · New York · Discrimination
Defendant Win
Employee v. New York City Transit Authority
E.D.N.Y. · Jul 2025
Employee v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
S.D.N.Y. · Jun 2025
Employee v. New York City Housing Authority
S.D.N.Y. · Jun 2025
Employee v. New York City Housing Authority
S.D.N.Y. · Jun 2025
Employee v. New York City Housing Authority
S.D.N.Y. · May 2025
Employee v. New York City Health + Hospitals Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · Mar 2025
Employee v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
E.D.N.Y. · Jan 2025
Employee v. New York City Transit Authority
S.D.N.Y. · Jan 2025
Employee v. Adams
NYSUPCTNEWYORK · Jan 2025 · Failure to Accommodate
Defendant Win
Showing 25 of 152

Other court records naming this party

16 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.