Skip to main contentDismissedDismissedMixed ResultDefendant WinDefendant Win
Edgar D. Laperriere, Jr. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
6th CircuitOctober 24, 2003No. 01-1576Cited 16 times
Plaintiff WinInternational Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America$165,573 awarded
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Cole, Gilman, Bright
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- jury verdict
- Circuit
- 6th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Breach of Contract
Outcome
The court affirmed a jury verdict awarding LaPerriere $165,573 for the UAW's breach of its duty of fair representation in arbitrarily withdrawing his discharge grievance without adequate justification.
What This Ruling Means
**Union Failed to Properly Represent Worker in Firing Case**
Edgar Laperriere sued his union, the United Automobile Workers (UAW), after they dropped his grievance case without good reason. When Laperriere was fired from his job, he filed a grievance through his union to challenge the termination. However, the UAW decided to withdraw his grievance case before it was fully resolved, essentially abandoning his fight to get his job back.
The court ruled in Laperriere's favor, ordering the UAW to pay him $165,573 in damages. The jury found that the union breached its legal duty to fairly represent him by arbitrarily pulling his grievance without adequate justification. The court determined the union acted improperly when it gave up on his case.
**What This Means for Workers:**
This ruling reinforces that unions have a legal obligation to fairly represent their members. Unions cannot simply abandon a worker's grievance case without valid reasons. If your union drops your case arbitrarily or fails to properly represent you, you may have grounds to sue them for damages. Workers have the right to expect their union will take their grievances seriously and see them through the proper process, not give up without justification.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Browse more:Breach of Contract cases
Similar Rulings
Garner
D. Colo.Apr 2022
Garner
D. Colo.Mar 2022
James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab
9th CircuitNov 2000
Umland v. PLANCO Financial Services, Inc.
3rd CircuitSep 2008
Rieth-Riley Constr. Co. v. NLRB
6th CircuitApr 2026
Read Full OpinionMore International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America RulingsAll Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.