International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
19 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1991–2022)
25 trusted published court opinions across 19 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America as an employer in 19 distinct federal employment cases between 1991 and 2022.
Of the 25 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 16 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 had a mixed result, 3 were sent back to a lower court, and 2 were dismissed.
Plaintiffs won 1 of 22 adjudicated opinions (5%).
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Retaliation, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in MI.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 19 distinct cases.
1 of 22 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America appears in 25 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Garner v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (2022) — Dismissed. This case involved a dispute between a worker named Garner and the United Automobile Workers (UAW) union. While the specific details of what triggered the disagreement aren't provided, this appears to be a labor relations conflict that made its way to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2022. Read the ruling.
Garner v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (2022) — Dismissed. This case involved a worker named Garner who had a dispute with the United Automobile Workers (UAW) union. While the specific details aren't provided, this appears to be a case where a union member was unhappy with how the UAW was representing them or handling their concerns. Read the ruling.
Kosa v. International Union United Automobile (2015) — Mixed Result. A worker named Kosa filed a lawsuit against the United Automobile Workers union (UAW), raising employment law claims. The specific details of the dispute—what Kosa claimed the union did wrong—are not provided in the available case information. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract (15 of 25), Retaliation (6 of 25), Discrimination (5 of 25). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Retaliation and Discrimination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span Michigan (4), Ohio (3), Colorado (2), Delaware (1). Michigan is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Michigan rulings, Ohio rulings, Colorado rulings and Delaware rulings.
These published opinions sit within the nonprofit sector, where mission-alignment defenses sometimes complicate Title VII analysis.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
25 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 5 summary-judgment opinions, 4 ended the case in International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
- Other rulings
- Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Nonprofit employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.