No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the wrongful discharge claim and summary judgment on the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, finding that the statutory remedy under KRS 338.121 preempted the common law wrongful discharge claim and that termination alone does not constitute extreme and outrageous conduct.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.