Skip to main content

Guesby v. Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center, Inc.

D. Kan.April 21, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02370
UnresolvableBoard of Education

Case Details

Nature of Suit
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status
Unknown
Procedural Posture
appeal
State
Kansas
Circuit
10th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

This is a dissenting opinion from a justice disagreeing with the majority's reversal of a teacher's discharge. The dissent argues the discharge was proper and the majority erred in finding the conduct remediable.

Similar Rulings

BEHLEN
D. Me.May 2023
Unresolvable
Arrico
Conn. App. Ct.Apr 2022

The defendants, an employer and its third-party administrator appealed to this court from the decision of the Compensation Review Board, which reversed in part the Workers' Compensation Commissioner's decision approving a form 36 filed by the defendants. During the course of his employment as a custodian, the plaintiff sustained a compensable injury and entered into two voluntary agreements with his employer. The plaintiff thereafter sustained another injury and two voluntary agree- ments were approved with respect to that injury. Subsequently, the defendants filed a form 36 seeking to discontinue or to reduce the plaintiff's workers' compensation benefits, asserting that the plaintiff had a work capacity and had reached maximum medical improvement. After formal hearings on the form 36 and on the plaintiff's entitlement to total disability benefits pursuant to statute (§ 31-307), the commissioner approved the form 36. The plaintiff appealed to the board, claiming inter alia, that the commissioner incorrectly concluded that further medical care of his compensable injuries would be palliative when that issue was not noticed for or litigated during the formal hearings. The plaintiff further claimed that the commissioner applied an improper standard in determining that his current disability was the result of preexisting, noncompensable injuries and, thus, not compensable under § 31-307. The board concluded that substantial evidence supported the commis- sioner's decision approving the form 36. The board, however, stated that it was persuaded that the manner in which the commissioner addressed this evidence impaired the plaintiff's right to a fair hearing. Accordingly, the board vacated the majority of the commissioner's con- clusions and remanded the matter for further proceedings. The board subsequently denied the plaintiff's motion for articulation or reconsider- ation in which he argued that a de novo trial before a different commis- sioner was required on remand, a

Remanded
WALSH
S.D. Ind.Aug 2021
Unresolvable
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Mixed Result
Giovanni Molina-Estrada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
9th CircuitJun 2002
Defendant Win

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.