Skip to main contentDefendant WinUnresolvableDismissedPlaintiff WinDefendant Win
Aplin v. Faurecia Interior Systems, Inc.
E.D. Mich.October 26, 2020No. 2:18-cv-10703
UnresolvableCity of Sacramento
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- summary judgment
- State
- Michigan
- Circuit
- 6th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
HarassmentHostile Work Environment
Outcome
This is a dissenting opinion from a California Supreme Court case involving alleged sexual assault by firefighters. The dissent argues that summary judgment should not have been granted because the plaintiff alleged a policy that made sexual assault foreseeable, creating a triable issue of fact regarding vicarious liability.
Similar Rulings
Keefe
S.D. Fla.Nov 2025
Sacramento Homeless Union v. City of Sacramento
E.D. Cal.May 2024
Levy
E.D. Cal.Aug 2022
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Raymond M. Cornwell v. Electra Central Credit Union James E. Sharp
9th CircuitMar 2006
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.