No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court reversed in part and affirmed in part the trial court's dismissal. The court found King stated a valid cause of action for retaliatory discharge under both common law and the Illinois Elder Abuse and Neglect Act, reversing the dismissal of that claim. The court affirmed dismissal of the claim against the individual defendant Schoenholtz in her individual capacity, but reversed as to SSA.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.