Skip to main content

Miller v. McDonald

W.D.N.Y.March 11, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00484
Defendant WinMcDonald

Case Details

Nature of Suit
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status
Unknown
Procedural Posture
appeal
Circuit
2nd Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision requiring the defendant to wear a protective face mask during trial (except while testifying), rejecting his constitutional challenges based on confrontation and due process rights.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.