State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
83 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2010–2026)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 8 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is named as a party in 83 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2010 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in IL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Muzzarelli v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (2025) — Mixed Result. A former employee filed a lawsuit against State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, claiming she experienced sex discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in the workplace. She also alleged the company wrongfully terminated her employment. The company attempted to dismiss her case early in the legal process. Read the ruling.
Kuk v. State Farm (2020) — Defendant Win. An employee filed a lawsuit against State Farm claiming the company discriminated against them based on race or sex, retaliated against them for reporting problems, harassed them, and wrongfully fired them. Read the ruling.
FRETT v. STATE FARM EMPLOYEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2020) — Plaintiff Win. A State Farm Insurance employee was injured during their scheduled lunch break while on company property. When the worker filed for workers' compensation benefits, State Farm denied the claim. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 5), Harassment (2 of 5), Retaliation (2 of 5). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation.
Published opinions span Illinois (2), Indiana (1). Illinois is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Illinois rulings and Indiana rulings.
These published opinions sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
11 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
- Employee v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyC.D. Ill. · 2021 · Illinois
- Employee v. WindhamSCCTAPP · 2020
- Employee v. State Farm LloydsTex. App.—14th Dist. · 2019
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. EmployeeKY · 2017
- Employee v. State Farm Lloyds, Inc.5th Circuit · 2016
- Employee v. State Farm Lloyds5th Circuit · 2014
- Employee v. Paden-AdamsSCCTAPP · 2013
- Employee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Ga. Ct. App. · 2009
- Employee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Tex. App.—5th Dist. · 2008
- Employee v. Government Employees Hospital Association, Inc., State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company6th Circuit · 2006
- Employee v. STATE FARM AND CAS. CO.Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2000
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.