Skip to main content

Cleveland v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

Ohio Ct. App.September 25, 2025No. 114616
Plaintiff WinCity of Cleveland

Case Details

Judge(s)
Forbes
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
Appeal of SERB administrative order; trial court affirmed

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The trial court affirmed SERB's finding that the City of Cleveland committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain with the Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association regarding the effects of a wearable-camera system policy change, as the collective-bargaining agreement did not expressly waive the right to such bargaining.

Excerpt

State Employment Relations Board; SERB; abuse of discretion; collective bargaining; R.C. 4117.11(A)(5); R.C. 4117.08; effects; policy change; collective-bargaining agreement; CBA. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in affirming the State Employment Relations Board's ("SERB") order and opinion finding that the City of Cleveland committed an unfair labor practice in violation of R.C. 4117.11(A)(5) when it refused to bargain with the Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association regarding the effects of a wearable-camera system, because the collective-bargaining agreement between the parties did not expressly and specifically state that the association was giving up the right to bargain the effects of the policy change.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.